Cliff's Quadrajet Parts and Rebuild Kits

Quadrajet Problem Solving => Quadrajet Parts and Numbers => Topic started by: Schurkey on June 12, 2009, 04:13:22 PM

Title: Q-Jet vs. DualJet
Post by: Schurkey on June 12, 2009, 04:13:22 PM
I went to my favorite salvage yard looking for decent core carbs.  Came home with two; and expect to find others once the ground dries up and I can drive through the rows of vehicles instead of confining my search to a couple of sheds filled with carbs.

Most of the carbs stacked on shelves in the shed are missing the choke coils, my two cores included.

There are a batch of DualJet carbs, some of which have the electric choke coils still mounted.

1.  What is the typical resistance of an electric choke coil?  My ohmmeter shows anywhere from 4 ohms to multi-thousand ohms; I'm sure some of those choke coils that I measured were defective.

2.  Are DualJet choke coils interchangeable with Q-Jet coils?  I'm sure they are.  The electrical connector retaining tabs on the coils on some--but not all--of the DualJets looks to be really huge.  The mating connector must be a monster.

3.  Anyone need a DualJet carb?  This place has a dozen or more just sitting on shelves.  EVERY DualJet I looked at had the larger venturi arrangement similar to the "800 CFM" Q-Jets.  There's a DualJet 165 (looks like a '74-older Q-Jet including a full-size casting where the "secondary" side is blank--no throttle plates, and no opening air valve; a DualJet 200 which looks like a '75-Newer Q-Jet and has a similar full-size casting with the blank secondary side; and a batch of DualJet 210 which are similar to the '75-Newer Q-Jet primary side, but the 210 is a smaller casting that doesn't have the secondary area at all.
Title: Re: Q-Jet vs. DualJet
Post by: Schurkey on June 12, 2009, 11:14:56 PM
Some comparison photos of the DualJet carbs.  Note that the photos are of carbs from a salvage yard, and taken on-site--thus the lovely grass and dirt backgrounds:

(http://hbassociates.us/DualJet165Top.jpg)
If you look really close, "DualJet 165" is cast into the area where the secondary air valve would be on a Q-Jet.

(http://hbassociates.us/DualJet200Top.jpg)
Choke blade is missing

(http://hbassociates.us/DualJet200bottom.jpg)
The DualJet 165 is similar.

(http://hbassociates.us/DualJet210top.jpg)

(http://hbassociates.us/DualJet210Bottom.jpg)
Title: Re: Q-Jet vs. DualJet
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on June 13, 2009, 02:58:23 AM
The choke coils will fit, use an lead from a positive battery post to the connector, then ground the housing on the negative battery post.  If it doesn't heat up in 3 minutes, it's JUNK.....Cliff
Title: Re: Q-Jet vs. DualJet
Post by: Schurkey on June 13, 2009, 09:35:36 AM
The choke coils will fit, use an lead from a positive battery post to the connector, then ground the housing on the negative battery post.  If it doesn't heat up in 3 minutes, it's JUNK.....Cliff
You don't recommend an ohmmeter to test them? 
Title: Re: Q-Jet vs. DualJet
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on June 16, 2009, 04:11:19 AM
Nothing better than a real test, as I don't fully trust electronic testing devices for these sorts of things.  The range is simply too wide.  If the unit doesn't heat up quickly, or heat up at all, it's toast!....Cliff