Cliff's Quadrajet Parts and Rebuild Kits
General Category => Quadrajet Carb Talk and Tips => Topic started by: frs on March 23, 2014, 08:25:11 PM
-
Asking about this carb# 17058471.its application,and would this be a good platform to use on a 454, auto,500 to 600 hp street and strip car ,base upon a stock appearing car ,and if not what number,or model,carb,would you recommend,also must be a side inlet.Thanks.
-
Asking about this carb# 17058471.its application,and would this be a good platform to use on a 454, auto,500 to 600 hp street and strip car ,base upon a stock appearing car ,and if not what number,or model,carb,would you recommend,also must be a side inlet.Thanks.
Welcome to CHP!
Can you post a photo of the carb and carb number?
-
Never mind, found it. It is a Holley Remanufactured carb. It was for a '78 Cadillac DeVille 425cid, Federal, A/T, M4ME carb.
-
Thank you Ethan1 for the info,and your time,my question is about it being a holley remain,this carb,doses not appear to be of a remain,it looks untouched looks like a new one, but dose appear to look like a cad,carb,and would holley re stamp,the carb?That dose not appear to be the case.
Here's a few pics. Thank you.
-
Thank you Ethan1 for the info,and your time,my question is about it being a holley remain,this carb,doses not appear to be of a remain,it looks untouched looks like a new one, but dose appear to look like a cad,carb,and would holley re stamp,the carb?That dose not appear to be the case.
Here's a few pics. Thank you.
Just going by my manual. It may not be a Holley Reman, but is definitely some sort of replacement. From other Holley Remans, the stamp looks like yours. Not perfect like Rochester did from the factory. Probably not a good carb to start with.
-
Thank you,i have a couple more q-jets to look at ,i will post those # and see if they are a better fit for what i am looking to do.Thanks again.
-
I have one of these too, and I pulled it from a '78 Cad in a junkyard. Mine does not appear to be a reman either. Numbers don't seem to follow the "normal" numbering convention, but from what I can tell, this seems like a good core to use.
One cool thing about this model (if I remember right, and I think your picture shows it), is that the secondary POE holes are below the secondary air valve plates.