Cliff's Quadrajet Parts and Rebuild Kits

Quadrajet Problem Solving => Diagnose a Quadrajet carburetor problem => Topic started by: bry593 on September 15, 2015, 11:12:23 AM

Title: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 15, 2015, 11:12:23 AM
I'm having an issue with a rebuilt Edelbrock 1901 quadrajet.  First off, here is my engine:

413 CI sbc, Crane .427/.427 lift cam w/110 center, Dart Iron heads w/2.02 valves, appx 8.8 to 9:1, iron quad, 2" rams into dual 2.25" pipes, GM HEI w/14 initial, 36 @ 2500 rpm and 50 at cruise.

I bought the rebuilt 1901 carb to replace a warped 4MV that was unresponsive to mixture screws.  After bolting it on, I proceeded to adjust the mix screws.  At 4.25 turns out, I achieved 18.5" Hg, but then could not reduce idle speed to 750 rpm.  A quick check showed that the fast idle was off and the primary throttle plates completely closed.

My first instinct was to check float level and it was found to be .420" (and the needle was clipped at the wrong side of the float bar).  Being that this is a 4MV carb, I set the float to somewhere between 5/16 and 3/8.  This didn't help.  Upon reassembly, and readjustment of AMS (again 4.25 turns), I placed my hand over the choke horn and the idle momentarily increased.  Still lean...  I then proceeded to check for vacuum leaks with a propane torch, but none were found.  Maybe I should use something with a bit more zip, like starting fluid?

My next attempt was to richen the main jets from the original 69 to 71.  This along with the original 36B needles.  Upon reassembly and placing a hand over the horn, the idle momentarily increased.  Still lean?

To maintain my initial timing and target idle rpm, I have connected the distributor advance to ported vacuum. 

My questions are:


Thank you for your consideration,
-Brian
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: 429bbf on September 16, 2015, 07:28:47 AM
welcome to CHP you need to measure the idle tubes and down channel channel restrictorsand the idle air bleeds.  .they play a very important part of what you are doing. i would start with receipe 2  for my idle . if you throw some sizes of that stuff out here someone will gladly help you.jets and needle do very litttle to fix your problem . hth.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 16, 2015, 10:42:14 AM
Thanks, I had heard the idle circuit is rich on the 1901 and was hoping it would be less involved.  But, this will be good experience.  Just a little worried I'll ruin a good carb in the process.

I currently don't have gauges small enough to measure the diameters.  I'll check with air/gas and see if a tip cleaner looks suitable.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: 429bbf on September 16, 2015, 11:48:04 AM
remember the idle tube restrictions are down about 2 plus inches. your standard drill bit will not reach. fwiw
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 16, 2015, 12:44:58 PM
I ordered the 61-80 bit set and pin vise along with cliff's book.  Hopefully these will be long enough.  Will get everything measured as soon as the items arrive.

I read somewhere that the 1901 is actually supposed to have a .420 float level.  Is this correct?
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: blazer74 on September 16, 2015, 08:36:59 PM
Standard set will not reach the restriction for the idle tube. You will need to remove the idle tubes to use those drill bits.

Cliff can supply new tubes also.

You can go to amazon and do  a search for taper length drill bit # 65 for example and buy them individualy, they don't always have all the sizes tho.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on September 17, 2015, 03:02:37 AM
Main jets and metering rods are not part of the idle system.  Idle tubes, DCR's, and idle airbleeds are the main players.

Having no control over idle speed indicates a vacuum leak someplace, provided the throttle plates are all completely closed. 

I'd remove the baseplate and verify fully seated throttle plates, and if you still don't have idle speed control you've got a vacuum leak someplace.

The 1901 doesn't have a generous idle fuel set-up, and if you don't have full control with the mixture screws after making sure everything is in good working order, then you'll have to go in and modify the idle system accordingly.

I'd also set the float at 1/4" and forget about it.  Float settings effect fuel delivery, too high or too low can have an impact on tuning......Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 17, 2015, 09:30:49 AM
Not many vacuum taps on this 1970 Chevy Coupe.  I'll cap the PCV and advance port, and also the booster and TH400 modulator on the manifold and try again.  If no change, then will remove unit for closer inspection.

Pulling the throttle body is probably a good idea since it will allow me to check the gasket hole pattern as well as torque on the screws.  I assume the gasket is probably correct since both mixture screws function.

That is not good news about my drill bit index.  Would a "jobber" set be long enough?
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 17, 2015, 09:32:43 AM
Off topic:  I was little surprised to see a '75 Forumula on Cliff's home page.  Very, very few of these cars around.  I have one and have owned it since 1987.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on September 22, 2015, 02:49:03 AM
No need to cap off the PCV, just remove the valve and put your finger over the end of it.  It adds a very small amount of air at idle when working correctly......Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on September 23, 2015, 08:07:39 AM
It will be a few days before I'm back on the carb.  I've got to get the dash back together.  Went in to fix the clock and blower switch, found some bad connectors and wiring. 
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 02, 2016, 05:49:49 PM
I am back on the carb and have drilled Recipe 1. 

First, I might say that it appears the Edelbrock carb is about as lean as possible.  The holes are much smaller in diameter than what Cliff recommends for a mild engine.  However, the body main air bleed is very large at .120".  I wonder if Edelbrock changes the size of the main airbed as a means to tune the entire system?

I haven't reassembled the carb at this point since I managed to lose my power piston spring, and I have a question for Cliff.  I had already drilled the airhorn main air bleeds before noticing the body bleeds were larger than Recipe 1.  What negative effects should I expect from a total main bleed of .07 + .12 over .07 + .07?  Should I try to plug the .120 and re-drill?  This is a large motor (413 CI) with a small cam, so maybe it's not an issue?

As I mentioned, I applied Recipe 1 and had to use both 0-60 and a 60-X drill sets.  I inserted drills into the holes until there was a no-go condition, and then assumed the previous size drill bit as the diameter.  A dial caliper was also used to record measurements before and after the holes were enlarged.  For the following data, the before diameters are listed first; followed by after and equivalent drill size:

Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 03, 2016, 11:32:20 AM
I talked to Cliff and he said the .120" main air bleed in the body is going to cause issues with this large motor and small cam.  It will simply pull too much air.  I've ordered some brass plugs/restrictors and will install these to reduce body bleed to .050 and also change the airhorn bleed back to what it was originally, .050".  It was suggested that I return the lower idle air bleed (just above the throttle body plates) back to the original .050" as well.  The #71 primary jets might be replaced with #69, depending on how rich everything seems after the orifices are resized.  The APT screw is going to be made functional so I can adjust the power piston height.  As a final recommendation, the vac advance is being routed to ported vacuum.  This will allow me to open the throttle blades a bit at idle, making the idle circuit function better.

Hope to have the modifications made by end of next week.  With any luck, the 1970 Caprice will be on a roadtrip the following Saturday!   
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 06, 2016, 02:01:35 PM
Pulled the apt screw.  Was loc-tited in so had to heat the base with a torch for about 5 secs.  Came out easily while still hot.  Before removing the screw, I measured spring pin to base as a reference, was .118".  Will set it back to this height and later adjust to where it is just slightly lean around 2000 rpm using the hand over the venturis method.

Hope to see my parts by Wed.  Anxious to have the old Chevy going again.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 10, 2016, 06:23:06 PM
I've made the recommended changes:


To change the choke pull off rate from 3.5s to 2s, the orifice was first drilled with the smallest bit in the set (.0135?).  This changed the rate to 1s, too fast.  I then silver soldered then port closed (metal housing) and then ground one side until I could just see a crack between the solder and the port.  This resulted in a 2s rate.

Main air bleed setscrew purchased from Cliff Ruggles:
(http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w130/bry593/1970%20Caprice/Quadrajet/IMG_0933.jpg)

Idle bypass plug, made from 1/4-20 UNC X 3/4 aluminum, pan head screw.  Purchased at ACE hardware, sectioned into two pieces, slotted with a Dremel and secured with red Loc-Tite.
(http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w130/bry593/1970%20Caprice/Quadrajet/IMG_0935.jpg)

Tuning the carburetor, I found max vacuum to be 16 in-Hg with idle screws backed out 3.5 turns.  Backing these out farther had only a slight effect on idle, however the vacuum began to drop.

Idle speed can now be controlled with the idle screw and it was set to 550 rpm in drive (about 650 in park).

I bought a new APT screw and spring from Cliff.  It is much longer than the original, so much easier to access with a screwdriver.  The screw was adjusted at 2000 rpm, and richened until a slight tilt of the choke flap caused no increase in rpm.  It was then leaned out until the tilt caused approximately a 100 rpm increase.  This was found to be 1/8 turn richer from the original setting.

A test drive revealed a noticeable improvement in primary circuit operation.  However, there is a slight hiccup (hesitation) when going into the secondaries.  Cliff, what would you recommend to address the secondary stumble?
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on March 12, 2016, 04:28:45 AM
If you can't tune out the stumble with the tension spring you may need to tune the pull-off release time slightly.....Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 25, 2016, 09:47:42 AM
Found a vacuum leak between the carb and manifold.  I used a gasket left over from a previous kit.  It looked right, 1/4" thick and open plenum, but it was cut short at the front near the PCV valve port.  The leak wasn't too obvious until the air cleaner was installed, and then you could really hear the hiss.

After installing the correct gasket, I had to retune.  Now my idle screws are out 1 turn (was 3.5) and the carb is loading up on fuel at an idle.  I'm thinking I should probably add idle bypass.  It originally had .098, which I blocked completely.  I'm going to try .050 and see if this cures the idle.  Will also check for nozzle drip as an additional verification.

On a side note, the vacuum is back up to 18.5 in-Hg from 16.  I originally attributed the reduced vacuum to having the primary blades open slightly at idle.

I've driven it about 300 miles with the current tune and still have a hesitation going into the secondaries. Will wind the spring back to the original 7/8 when I drill the idle bypass. 

Ironically, I'm almost back to the original Edelbrock tune.  The primary difference being a reduction in the main air bleeds (body) and enlarging the .029" idle bleed tubes.  At this point, I might even throw in the original primary and secondary metering rods and put the choke pulloff back to 3.5 s. 
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 25, 2016, 05:03:24 PM
Okay, back from the mod and tune.  Turns out, I'm an idiot.  The reason I was having a hiccup going into the secondaries is that I forgot to reinstall the link between air flap and choke pulloff.

In this round of mods, I went ahead and pulled the idle bypass plugs completely out.  I also put back in the original primary and secondary metering rods.  I left the airflap spring at 3/4 turn.  I have a good idle, no primary hesitation and only a miniscule secondary hesitation which I can probably adjust out with the air flap screw.

Below is a list of the original Edelbrock 1901 tune, and final tune:

•Idle Mixture Holes: .077 ; .087 #43
•Idle Bypass: .098 ; .098 #39
•Idle Tube: .029 ; .036 #64
•Idle Down Channel/Restrictors: .046 ; .046 #56
•Lower Idle Air Bleed: .062 ; .070 #50
•Upper Idle Air Bleed (in body): .070 ; .070 #50
•Accelerator Pump Discharge: .026 ; .026 #71
•Main Air Bleed (in body): .120 ; .052 #55
•Main Air Bleed (in air horn): .050 ; .052 #55
•Primary Jet: .069 ; .071 #71
•Primary Metering Rod: .035 3EE; .035 3EE
•Fuel Inlet Seat: .110 ; .125
•Float Level: .420 ; .313
•Secondary POE Well Restriction (in body): .032 ; .038 #62
•Secondary POE Discharge (at flap): .052 ; .052 #55
•Secondary Tube Restriction (innermost two): .026 ; .036 #64
•Secondary Hanger: K ; K
•Secondary Metering Rod: DR; DR
•Air Flap Open Distance: 1.295; 1.295
•Secondary/Air Flap Spring: 7/8 ; 3/4 turns
•Choke Pull-off Release Time: 3.5s; 2s

Idle mixture screws are now at 2 turns out.

It seems the only things wrong with the original 1901 tune were the main body air bleeds and idle tubes.

Anyway, glad the carburetor project is finished.  It was a lot of time and a great learning experience dialing it in.

Thanks to Cliff for helping me get it right!
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 28, 2016, 10:36:07 AM
There is a typo in the bulleted list above:

•Primary Jet: .069 ; .071 #71

should read:

•Primary Jet: .069 ; .069 #69

This is actually a fairly rich primary, but it seems to be working.  The other combinations I have available:

.071 & .045 = .0024 in^2 (Didn't get a chance to try this out and is what came stock on the 402 Chevy)
.069 & .045 = .0021 in^2 (Recommended by Cliff, haven't tried this with the idle by pass opened)
.069 & .035 = .0028 in^2 (What I'm currently running.  Seems to be working okay in the 100 miles or so I've used it).

Eventually, I might try the smaller jet combo again.  Lots of other projects going on.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on March 29, 2016, 01:27:57 AM
Are you using the APT system in the baseplate? 

We install an external screw at that location so we can fine tune part throttle A/F without taking the carb apart and changing metering rods.

The .125" N/S assembly is too small for the power level and .420" is too low for the float setting unless you have a high pressure fuel pump w/o a regulator.....Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 30, 2016, 10:50:01 AM
Q. Are you using the APT system in the baseplate? We install an external screw at that location so we can fine tune part throttle A/F without taking the carb apart and changing metering rods.
A. Yes, I got a new APT screw and spring from you.  I have tuned it with the tip in (+50ish rpm @ 2000), but I've noticed my gas mileage has dropped a bit.  I'm thinking about changing from the .035" to the .045" primary rods with the #69 jets per your original recommendation.  On a side note, the choke works great, starts right up and begins to roughen up after 30s, hit the pedal once to drop it to the next stop and it idles clears up.  At that point, I'm hitting the rouad and the choke is completely off.  Works better than any quad choke I've had.

Q.  The .125" N/S assembly is too small for the power level and .420" is too low for the float setting unless you have a high pressure fuel pump w/o a regulator.....Cliff
A.  I drilled the seat out to .125" per recipe one.  You think I should go larger?  This isn't really a high-power car, just a large engine in a relatively heavy, 1970 Caprice.  I have the float set at .313", not .420".  I chose this as a compromise between your and Lars recommendations.  Seems to be working okay, and there are no gas fumes or soaked airhorn gasket issues.

At this point I have a few other projects to tidy up (motorcycle fuel system overhaul, front rotors for the Caprice, painting the house, etc.).  Might be awhile before I can provide further updates as I dial it in for peak efficiency.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on March 31, 2016, 03:36:40 AM
Since you have APT install the larger metering rods, the smaller ones will not provide full control of A/F from rich to lean.

Install the high flow .135" N/S assembly and set the float to 1/4".

Fuel level effects the calibration, and the float level and fuel seat diameter effect the fuel level.  Unless the fuel pump is really high pressure, there is no need to run a low float setting......Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on March 31, 2016, 10:16:25 AM
Will do.  Won't take too much time to pull the carb off and drill and peen the needle jet, bend the the nitrophyl and swap out the primary rods.  I'm getting pretty speedy at this point.

Should I change out the DR secondary rods to DA?  The DA are a bit smaller, but have a longer tip.  If so, can you explain how this would benefit?  I'm not sure I understand the theory behind the medium and long tips.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on March 31, 2016, 10:47:37 AM
They will richen up the A/F at full throttle, probably a good move, DR's have a much larger tip and leaner.  I always prefer a little extra fuel at full throttle, keeps the rod bearings out of the oil pan in most cases!.....Cliff
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: bry593 on April 04, 2016, 10:15:00 AM
I swapped out the rods for the .045, reset the float to 1/4", but did not drill out the needle jet (was in a hurry).  Set the IMS to 2.25 turns out and readjusted the APT at 2000 rpm. 

Loaded up the family, filled up with gas and then drove 65 miles to another gas station.  Refilling the tank to the same level (all the way up the fill hose) took 2.4 gallons.  65/2.4 = 27 mpg at 70-80 mph.  That's with a TH400 and 2.56 gears.  I'm going to finish out this tank to see what my average is with in town driving.

Cliff, I'd say this carb seems dialed in.
Title: Re: Edel 1901, AMS out, Still Lean at Idle
Post by: Cliff Ruggles on April 05, 2016, 03:17:01 AM
Good news!......