Author Topic: #17057216 or #17085226 better option  (Read 1573 times)

Offline Mlcdc1

  • Garage guy
  • **
  • Posts: 12
#17057216 or #17085226 better option
« on: September 29, 2024, 08:24:57 AM »
Currently restoring my 1977 GMC C15 to original as much as possible and would like to replace the Edelbrock that is currently on the stock 350 engine, auto trans with a quadrajet. I have both the 17057216 and 17085226 available. I’m more concerned about gas mileage over power since it is mostly just going to be a cruising truck. Would welcome any and all suggestions on the best option along with best rod/jet combos. Thanks in advance.

Offline quadrajam

  • Carb lover
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: #17057216 or #17085226 better option
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2024, 06:37:11 PM »
Are you still using the factory intake with the choke stove? Edelbrock carb on an adaptor?
Or do you have an aftermarket intake with dual mounting pattern?

QJ

Offline Mlcdc1

  • Garage guy
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: #17057216 or #17085226 better option
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2024, 06:58:41 PM »
Stock intake with Edelbrock on adapter with electric choke

Offline quadrajam

  • Carb lover
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: #17057216 or #17085226 better option
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2024, 07:25:11 PM »
Either could be built for power and milage. If originality is more important the 77 carb
would be the choice. I prefer the 85226.  Electric choke, Better castings, more cover screws,
one more throttle plate screw. Needs very little mods for your mild 350. Kick-down works for
700r4 or th350 CHP quality kit and recipe #1 in the book.

Offline Cliff Ruggles

  • Administrator
  • Qjet Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5435
Re: #17057216 or #17085226 better option
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2024, 04:20:17 AM »
If you have the factory divorced choke I'd use the original factory carburetor. 

Is the engine "stock" otherwise, or have changes been made to it?